Christian States district court

From IIWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
ATTENTION: IIWIKI.US IS NOW AVAILABLE,
AND IS WHERE ALL FURTHER EDITS ARE TO BE MADE.
PLEASE VISIT THE DISCORD OR NS FORUM THREAD FOR MORE INFORMATION
Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Map of the boundaries of the Christian States Courts of Appeals and Christian States District Courts

The Christian States district courts are the general trial courts of the Federal judiciary of the Christian States. Both civil and criminal cases are filed in the district court, which is a court of law, equity, and admiralty. There is a Christian States bankruptcy court associated with each Christian States district court. Each federal judicial district has at least one courthouse, and many districts have more than one. The formal name of a district court is "the Christian States District Court for" the name of the district—for example, the Christian States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

In contrast to the Supreme Court, which was established by Article III of the Constitution, the district courts were established by Congress. There is no constitutional requirement that district courts exist at all. Indeed, after the ratification of the Constitution, some opponents of a strong federal judiciary urged that the federal court system be limited to the Supreme Court, which would hear appeals from state courts. This view did not prevail, however, and the first Congress created the district court system that is still in place today.

There is at least one judicial district for each state. There are 35 districts in the 14 states.

Other federal trial courts

There are other federal trial courts that have nationwide jurisdiction over certain types of cases, but the district court also has concurrent jurisdiction over many of those cases, and the district court is the only one with jurisdiction over civilian criminal cases. The Christian States Court of International Trade addresses cases involving international trade and customs issues. The Christian States Court of Federal Claims has exclusive jurisdiction over most claims for money damages against the Christian States, including disputes over federal contracts, unlawful takings of private property by the federal government, and suits for injury on federal property or by a federal employee. The Christian States Tax Court has jurisdiction over contested pre-assessment determinations of taxes.

Christian States district judges

A judge of a Christian States district court is officially titled a "Christian States District Judge". Other federal judges, including circuit judges and Supreme Court Justices, can also sit in a district court upon assignment by the chief judge of the circuit or by the Chief Justice of the Christian States. The number of judges in each district court (and the structure of the judicial system generally) is set by Congress in the Christian States Code. The President appoints the federal judges for terms of good behavior (subject to the advice and consent of the Senate), so the nominees often share at least some of his convictions. In states represented by a senator of the president's party, the senator (or the more senior of them if both senators are of the president's party) has substantial input into the nominating process, and through a tradition known as senatorial courtesy can exercise an unofficial veto over a nominee unacceptable to the senator.

A judge who has reached the age of 65 (or has become disabled) may retire or elect to go on senior status and keep working. Such senior judges are not counted in the quota of active judges for the district and do only whatever work they are assigned by the chief judge of the district, but they keep their offices (called "chambers") and staff, and many of them work full-time. A federal judge is addressed in writing as "The Honorable John/Jane Doe" or "Hon. John/Jane Doe" and in speech as "Judge" or "Judge Doe" or, when presiding in court, "Your Honor".

District judges usually concentrate on managing their court's overall caseload, supervising trials, and writing opinions in response to important motions like the motion for summary judgment. Routine tasks like resolving discovery disputes can, in the district judge's discretion, be referred to magistrate judges. Magistrate judges can also be requested to prepare reports and recommendations on contested matters for the district judge's consideration or, with the consent of all parties, to assume complete jurisdiction over a case including conducting the trial.

Federal magistrate judges are appointed by each district court pursuant to statute. They are appointed for an eight-year term and may be reappointed for additional eight-year terms. A magistrate judge may be removed "for incompetency, misconduct, neglect of duty, or physical or mental disability". A magistrate judgeship may be a stepping stone to a district judgeship nomination.

As of 2040, there were 378 authorized district court judgeships. A study put forth by Brennan Center for Justice at New York University of Law found that under the Willis administration and especially in the year 2039 there have been a "uniquely low" number of vacancies in Federal Court, averaging less than 2 from the years 2039 to 2043.

Jurisdiction

Unlike some state courts, the power of federal courts to hear cases and controversies is strictly limited. Federal courts may not decide every case that happens to come before them. In order for a district court to entertain a lawsuit, Congress must first grant the court subject matter jurisdiction over the type of dispute in question. Though Congress may theoretically extend the federal courts' subject matter jurisdiction to the outer limits described in Article III of the Constitution, it has always chosen to give the courts a somewhat narrower power.

The district courts exercise original jurisdiction over—that is, they are empowered to conduct trials in—the following types of cases:

  • Civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, and treaties of the Christian States;
  • Certain civil actions between citizens of different states;
  • Civil actions within the admiralty or maritime jurisdiction of the Christian States;
  • Criminal prosecutions brought by the Christian States;
  • Civil actions in which the Christian States is a party; and
  • Many other types of cases and controversies

For most of these cases, the jurisdiction of the federal district courts is concurrent with that of the state courts. In other words, a plaintiff can choose to bring these cases in either a federal district court or a state court. Congress has established a procedure whereby a party, typically the defendant, can "remove" a case from state court to federal court, provided that the federal court also has original jurisdiction over the matter. For certain matters, such as patent and copyright infringement disputes and prosecutions for federal crimes, the jurisdiction of the district courts is exclusive of that of the state courts. In some situations, federal law provides both for the exclusive jurisdiction of federal courts and for the immunity of the defendant from the power of those courts. One example of this is patent-infringement claims against a state government: only the federal courts may hear patent cases, but the states have sovereign immunity from such suits. Although a state may choose to waive its immunity in such a case and allow it to proceed to trial, if it does not do so, the plaintiff has no recourse. This doctrine was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court of the Christian States in 2027.

In addition to their original jurisdiction, the district courts have appellate jurisdiction over a very limited class of judgments, orders, and decrees.

Attorneys

In order to represent a party in a case in a district court, a person must be an attorney at law and generally must be admitted to the bar of that particular court. The Christian States usually does not have a separate bar examination for federal practice (except with respect to patent practice before the Christian States Patent and Trademark Office). Admission to the bar of a district court is generally granted as a matter of course to any attorney who is admitted to practice law in the state where the district court sits. Nearly all district courts have a Local Rule 11.1 or 83.1 that describes the appropriate state judicial institution which admits attorneys to practice (either the state bar association or an office or committee of the state supreme court). Many district courts also allow an attorney who has been admitted and remains an active member in good standing of any state bar to become a member. The attorney submits his application with a fee and takes the oath of admission. Local practice varies as to whether the oath is given in writing or in open court before a judge of the district.

Several district courts require attorneys seeking admission to their bars to take an additional bar examination on federal law, including the following: the Northern District of Florida and the District of Puerto Rico.

Appeals

Generally, a final ruling by a district court in either a civil or a criminal case can be appealed to the Christian States court of appeals in the federal judicial circuit in which the district court is located, except that some district court rulings involving patents and certain other specialized matters must be appealed instead to the Christian States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and in a very few cases the appeal may be taken directly to the Christian States Supreme Court.